Search for: "Pray v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 1:31 pm by sgottlieb
It has always been legal to teach comparative religion or the history of religion in public schools in the United States. [read post]
16 May 2015, 3:17 pm by Kevin
Under this charge, the question boils down to this: do you think that this evidence shows that these people "willfully injured national-defense premises" with the "intent to injure, interfere with, or obstruct the national defense of the United States"? [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:34 am by Eric Turkewitz
Specifically, they objected to two English language prayers, one for the United States and one for Israel. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:02 am by SHG
It was a second marriage for both Donna Lou Young and Henry V. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The husband immigrated to the United States from Ireland in 1984 and began working as a handyman. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:10 pm
At all times material hereto, the Plaintiffs have been engaged and continue to be engaged in activities protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 3. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 10:42 am by Cody Poplin
Some in Syria have suggested that the U.S. laser-like focus on the Islamic State has given cover to Assad, allowing him to tackle less extreme and more moderate forces – those same forces the United States may eventually need to employ to defeat ISIS. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in United States history. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
Additionally, the receipt of this warning letter and any action taken to correct the violations cited in it do not preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution by the United States Department of Justice[15]. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, said, “The justices have set a dangerous precedent. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by SHG
Maybe the person was Muslim and prayed at a mosque (“associated with known terrorists”) or was a United States Marine (“trained in the use of military-grade weapons”). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
I’ve been thinking more about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]