Search for: "Pray v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2017, 4:29 am by SHG
Wade, decided in 1973, was a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by Stephen Wermiel
Nearly three years ago, Justice Alito found himself in the center of a controversy when President Obama in his speech criticized the Court’s (then) recently issued decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Shamnad Basheer
 It is pertinent to note that the United States contains only a “fair use” or fair dealing provision and not a separate “educational instruction” exception. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:12 pm by Amy Howe
  And it doesn’t matter that many more religions are now represented in the United States than back then. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am by Josh Blackman
Two months ago, the Supreme Court decided a similar case, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:13 am by Tung Yin
 As the Supreme Court stated in Jacobson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:23 am by jonathanturley
While the district court ruled against Wilson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed and found a violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 12:57 am by Frank Cranmer
The Faculty prayed for is, accordingly, refused. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The moving and opposition briefs were filed before the United States Supreme Court entered an injunction pendente lite in the case of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
That is, Congress should state explicitly that detention authority under the AUMF and the NDAA does not extend to any persons captured within the territory of the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
Many other Bishops may not be aware of it just now, but they are going to face plenty of storms in their own dioceses after they return.This is not like General Convention 2003, when people had to read the news about the confirmation of V. [read post]