Search for: "Prentice v. Prentice" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2008, 9:42 pm
Whatever shake up is going on elsewhere is totally irrelevant to the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK (No2).Failing Bridget Prentice clarifying her answer to show the relevance of the Prisoners Votes Case to the Governance of Britain Green Paper and the Goldsmith Review, she should do the honourable thing and resign. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:15 am by 76admin
This week on Hull and Estate, Natalia Angelini and Sydney Osmar discuss Dale v Prentice, in which the Ontario Superior Court of Justice addresses whether a drafting solicitor can represent the estate in a will challenge. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Premier Prentice gave every member of his caucus a copy of Doris Kearns Goodwin’s book Team of Rivals. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:42 pm by Liisa Speaker
The case of People v Prentice (Docket 303602) provides some relevancy to MY SPACE. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:39 pm
Deeds not words: Let's have some action on prisoners voting rightsRobert Neill: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what plans he has to extend voting rights to sentenced prisoners in England and Wales. [218573]Bridget Prentice: Following the European Court of Human Rights' judgment in the case of Hirst v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 9:21 am
The answer is important, because it dictates whether a trial court must conduct a gatekeeper hearing under Daubert in advance of the expert's testimony.In a recent Connecticut case, Prentice v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 10:07 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff claimed that Odinist religious services were scheduled to conflict with his lunch time and his outdoor recreation time, in violation of his rights under RLUIPA and the equal protection clause.In Prentice v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Here’s what Jim Prentice’s Budget 2015* told Albertans. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Engel v Prentice, 2020 ABCA 462 (CanLII) [26] The appellants argue that the interpretation of the chambers judge leaves s 38.1 of the Election Act without any purpose. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 1:48 pm by Colin E. Flora
Corp., 266 Ind. 491, 494, 365 N.E.2d 752, 753 (1977) (Prentice, J.).Polk-King v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Association of Professional Engineers v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 11:16 am by Howard Knopf
This is nothing short of an end run around the appeal process in the Access Copyright v. [read post]