Search for: "Presley v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2016, 8:54 am
See e.g., Keller v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:54 am
See e.g., Keller v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:55 am
Over in the Land of Fairness Compensation, Monika Bross (1709 Blog) reviews the prospects for success of the late Elvis Presley's daughter and Elvis Presley Enterprises LLC in their current German compensation claim. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:32 pm
(Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:09 am
” Presley v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:05 am
Suspicious Minds was Elvis Presley’s seventeenth and last number one hit single. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:05 pm
He is not Elvis Presley. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Presley Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0417p.06 O'Bryan v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 12:23 pm
The legislation states that it does not affect the holding of Presley Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Roberson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Have no fear, though; previously, in Lake v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 5:13 am
Georgia, 467 U.S. 39, 48 (1984); see also Presley v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Franklin Mint Company v. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:08 pm
Supreme Court’s 2000 decision in FDA v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Khan v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:26 am
Plaintiffs seemed to think that this fact alone was sufficient to confer jurisdiction under Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
Case 4: State of California v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
