Search for: "Price v. Baker" Results 1 - 20 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 3:56 am by Jim Hassett
  If you want to focus on the “how to,” you can jump directly to Part V, which describes Baker’s “Eight steps to implementing value pricing”:  1)      Conversation. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 1:08 pm by Donna
If you want to focus on the “how to,” of value pricing, you can jump directly to Part V of Ron Baker’s book, which describes his “Eight steps to implementing value pricing”Via [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 10:15 am
Ron Baker of Vera Sage Institute posted yesterday about yet another lawyer moving away from hourly billing in his post, Memphis Attorney Moves to Fixed Pricing. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 5:09 am by David Bernstein
It is a form of price regulation, and price regulation goes on all over the place in regulatory agencies. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 2:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1962 decision in Baker v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:09 am by Ted Frank
Add the plaintiff-friendly Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Mary L. Dudziak
:Insurrections & Infections: Rethinking the Legal History of Atlanta, 1920-1940 – InmanChair - Robert Baker, Georgia State UniversityPolly Price, Emory University, “Federalization of the Mosquito: Malaria and Public Health In the Southern United States, 1900-1945”Maryan Soliman, University of Pennsylvania, “Racial Equality on Trial in Atlanta during the 1930s”Anders Walker, Saint Louis University, “Scarlett’s Rainbow: Margaret Mitchell,… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:17 pm by Christine Hurt
  My former boss David Sterling of Baker Botts rephrases this as "price impact," but it's hard to prove a price impact but not loss causation or vice versa. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:02 pm
Four of the defendants are former officers and directors of Ramp Corporation and Xybernaut Corporation, including Martin Weisberg, a former partner at Baker & McKenzie law firm. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
In The Economist, Steven Mazie takes issue with the amicus brief filed by the federal government in support of a baker who refused to create a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, arguing that although the brief characterizes wedding cakes as “’inherently communicative,’” it “provides no evidence that even the most elaborately decorated and exorbitantly priced wedding confections are imbued with the capacity of speech. [read post]