Search for: "Price v. Chicago"
Results 1 - 20
of 769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2023, 6:17 am
Arthur-Price v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 3:00 am
Evidence from Hospital Mergers Zarek Brot-Goldberg University of Chicago - Harris School of Public Policy Zack Cooper Yale University Stuart V. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
Keith Price v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 6:19 am
In a much-anticipated decision, on June 27, 2017, the Supreme Court of Delaware reversed the Chancery Court’s ruling in Chicago Bridge v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 1:37 pm
” Basically, the Neo-Chicago school is the combination of price theory, empiricism and the error-cost framework to inform the design of antitrust liability rules. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
Court of Appeals in Chicago. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:05 pm
Court of Appeals in Chicago, sitting en banc, ruled earlier this week. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
The case is USA v Aleynikov, U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 11:34 am
The case, which handed a win to CITGO allowing it to charge higher prices than those urged by The Pantry, is The Pantry, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:08 pm
Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:39 am
As interesting as the issue of identifying the appropriate post-Leegin rule of reason RPM framework is, I want to focus instead on an interesting historical and analytical point Professor Marvel makes about the intellectual foundations of the Leegin decision and its approach to the law and economics of vertical restraints: The antitrust treatment of non-price vertical restraints is a much compressed mirror of that of vertical price restraints. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Last week (June 7), a petition for certiorari (full text) was filed in Price v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:10 am
Supply Restrictions, Price Increases Might Demonstrate Illegal Price FixingThis posting was written by Darius Sturmer, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.Manufacturers of containerboard, the principal raw material used to make linerboard and corrugated boxes, could have engaged in price fixing in violation of Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act by allegedly undertaking a course of conduct that included contemporaneous supply restrictions and price increases, the… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm
In Messner v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:08 am
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 2:10 pm
In Right Field Rooftops, LLC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:35 pm
Court of Appeals in Chicago has ruled. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 5:22 am
Supreme Court heard arguments from litigants in the case of Kirtsaenge v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 11:47 am
In FTC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 1:32 pm
Lubin Austermuehle track record includes the fact that the firm obtained a $40 million settlement in the Erikson v. [read post]
