Search for: "Price v. Cohen" Results 61 - 80 of 266
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But if TM law is a law of competition, that matters; why be so comfortable w/allowing parties opportunistic definitions in litigation v. mark definition? [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,”  “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low potential for psychological or physical… [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J ruled that the reports meant that the claimant had “procured or authorised a corrupt payment of $400,000 to be made to Michael Cohen, the personal lawyer of Donald Trump, to extend a brief meeting between the claimant and President Trump… into more substantial talks”. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and David Moosmann
This is in keeping with the central purpose of federal campaign finance law, as the US Supreme Court put it in Buckley v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:37 am by SHG
Seizing upon some excess verbiage the Supreme Court throws into a decision to create the sense of a distinction so that the Court appears less hypocritical, the CCA relied on dicta from Cohen v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
24 May 2018, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d at 50; LaRusso v Katz, 30 AD3d 240, 243 [1st Dept 2006]; Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005]; see Stackpole v Cohen, Ehrlich & Frankel, LLP, 82 AD3d 609, 610 [1st Dept 2011].) [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
 On 18 May 2018 Jay J granted an injunction in the case of Reid v Price, preventing Katie Price from showing “sexual” pictures of her former husband Alex Reid. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
Worth exploring the way this approach changes approaches to regulation off markets and markets pricing, supply, etc. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
On 2 May 2018, Sir Geoffrey Vos heard an application in the case of Appleby v BBC. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
David Price QC, who is representing the appellants, has suggested that the Supreme Court is likely to hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print in  between October and December 2018. [read post]