Search for: "Price v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 13,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2024, 2:37 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  The patent at issue – EP 3883277 - covers a “method for communicating spatially located information to a mobile terminal” and relates to the display of price information in a sales area by means of electronic labels. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by Tessa Shepperson
Chung v Notting Hill Genesis This is a case that exemplifies the Court’s power to extend time limits. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm by Maddy Carter
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Several other states also filed regulatory enforcement actions against Centene. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Recently, a series of federal court decisions in the case of Adams v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 12:08 pm by Dylan Gibbs
— Dylan Gibbswith Alexandra SonTODAY'S DOCKETPaying the price for Charter-infringing legislationService dog discriminationGreenwashing guidanceIllegal sports streamingLegal tech fundingAnd the thieving fraudster who wrote a fake willSCCGovernment risks damages for enacting Charter-infringing legislationCanada (AG) v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Choi at University of Michigan Law School, and Geeyoung Min at Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While most Englishmen preferred their “kinswomen,” he “had found it convenient and pleasant to associate with Indians and he must pay the price” (p. 66). [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:19 am by Felix Le Roux
The Constitutional Court stated that the courts favour a settlement because it reduces the demands on the judiciary and allows their limited resources to be reallocated to other cases. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
For example, in the case of pharmaceutical products, the current law in some contracting member states suggests that the trigger for a PI may be marketing activities, an application for (or the grant of) pricing and/or reimbursement, or even the grant of a marketing authorisation. [read post]