Search for: "Price v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 13,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2011, 7:24 am
By Cara CooksonBradford Oil Company, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
As the recent decision in Brown v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
That was the unusual fact pattern in GMA Cover Corp. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:33 am
Our Case of the Day is SEC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
In Chappell v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court of the United States on February 27 issued its decision in Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
In Rodriguez v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 5:19 am
In her paper, Professor Lampley discusses the methods a court may utilize to examine the potentially prohibitive costs associated with pursing individual arbitration following recent United States Supreme Court precedent in American Express Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:11 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
In addition, over two dozen states attorneys general jointly brought an action against a number of generic drug companies alleging price collusion. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Of course, Judge Price went on to reject Tapps' arguments that section 46.04 didn't apply to state jail felonies. [read post]
13 May 2008, 9:54 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 6:31 am
The New York Court of Appeals has issued an opinion in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
(Citibank was not required to produce a written agreement to recover on account-stated theory) -- CONTRA -- Tully v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 2:15 pm
Price also suggested that the case Church of the Holy Trinity v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:24 pm
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:01 pm
There's more commentary--to your right and below--including Allison Shields', and her fine post "Even More Talk About Pricing". [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:05 pm
In People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 6:18 am
Pivotal Software, Inc. v. [read post]
