Search for: "Price v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 13,094
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2010, 10:06 am by msW1Ld
  California now joins Illinois, New York and Michigan (see March 31, 2008 Post) in treating resale price maintenance as a per se offense in violation of its state antitrust law even though such conduct is subject to rule of reason review under section 1 of the Sherman Act after Leegin Creative Lether Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm by Stephen Wu
The price of a little piracy can be rather steep, as proved in a recent California case. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am by Keith Szeliga
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified… [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gregory Forman
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court accepted certiorari on the South Carolina case of Price v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 9:07 am
Because of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:52 am by Daniel Cappetta
” In resolving that question, the Court “applied the four-factor test announced in [United States v.] [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:38 pm
The decisions are In re: New Jersey Title Insurance Litigation, 2012-1 Trade Cases ¶77,921 and McCray v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:22 pm
(…) Legislation is, after all, the art of compromise, the limitations expressed in statutory terms often the price of passage, and no statute yet known “pur­sues its stated purpose at all costs. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
Independent Parallel PricingThough features of the retail gasoline market on Martha’s Vineyard—including barriers to entry, inelastic consumer demand, and product homogeneity—made it susceptible to efforts by gas stations to sustain anticompetitive prices, those features facilitated not only conspiratorial pricing but also merely interdependent parallel pricing, the court stated. [read post]