Search for: "Price v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 1,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 9:41 am by Hakemi
Earlier this month, the Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the earlier 2008 Quebec Superior Court decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am by Judith Robinson
The court noted the law’s reluctance to impose restrictions on freedom of trade of genuine products that were lawfully obtained and sold after Coty had already received the sale price. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 5:25 am by Judith Robinson
The court noted the law’s reluctance to impose restrictions on freedom of trade of genuine products that were lawfully obtained and sold after Coty had already received the sale price. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (Benson), ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Feb. 25, 2009), reads Prop. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:40 am
Juroviesky and Ricci filed an action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice for violations of the Competition Act and provincial consumer protection acts against major chocolate producers. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court, 154 Cal.App.4th 1491 (2007) (discussed in this blog post). [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
A well-reasoned and pithy analysis of this type of issue was featured in a recent decision by the Complex Commercial Litigation Division of the Delaware Superior Court in the matter styled LDC Parent, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:32 am by Christopher Bird
Madame Justice Susan Himel of the Ontario Superior Court today released her decision in the challenge to Canada's prostitution laws launched by sex trade worker Terri-Jean Bradford. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:26 pm by admin
These companion decisions by the British Columbia Court of Appeal were in contrast and conflict to a third Quebec Court of Appeal decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:38 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In so ruling ,the Superior Court followed the reasoning of the united States Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit in State Farm v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 12:08 pm by Brian T. Pedigo, Esq.
Selling goods or services below cost with the intent to, and the tendency to, injure competitors violates Business and Professions Code §17043 and therefore gives rise to an action under Business and Professions Code §17200 (unfair competition law).Fisherman's Wharf Bay Cruise Corp. v Superior Court (2003) 114 CA4th 309, 327, 7 CR3d 628. [read post]