Search for: "Price v. Superior Court" Results 81 - 100 of 1,231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2010, 10:31 am
  The Court noted that, "Because of the rapid price fluctuations in the grain market, oral contracts are the norm. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by Chelsey Russell
On August 8, 2010, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s holding in Miller v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am by Peter Mahler
The latest addition to this ill-fated family of cases is entitled Namerow v PediatriCare Associates, LLC, decided last November by a New Jersey Superior Court judge, in which the court enforced a fixed price buy-sell agreement among members of a medical practice where the original certificate of value hadn’t been updated for 16 years at the time of the plaintiff doctor’s retirement from the practice. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   Anyone wishing to review this non-precedential decision by the Superior Court in Adams may click this LINK.I send thanks to Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, Pennsylvania office of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
A judge who’s calling escalating prices on the court’s time has given the parties in a bankruptcy proceeding just two weeks to file a joint litigation plan after he took over aggressive management of the case.Ontario Superior Court Justice David Brown made the order in Atlas Holdings v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The “price” of the books was twenty-five cents each, the “price” of the pamphlets five cents each. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Superior Court (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1185); sellers of used products (Wilkinson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm by Kirk Jenkins
That was the issue pending before the Illinois Supreme Court earlier this month in Price v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Some courts hold that “bald assertions of price superiority constitute puffery if they are so sufficiently general that a consumer is unlikely to rely on the statement. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:44 am by admin
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm by Keith Szeliga and Katie Calogero
TINA specifically prohibits a contractor from claiming the Government’s price would not have decreased because the procurement was sole source or the contractor otherwise had superior bargaining power.[16] A contractor also cannot claim the Contracting Officer should have known the data were defective even though the contractor took no affirmative action to inform the Contracting Officer the data were defective.[17] A contractor cannot claim the price would not… [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Compared to Japanese courts, Delaware courts often adopts the DCF method, but in recent years, as in Japan, the tendency to adopt merger prices has become more apparent, particularly after the Supreme Court decisions in Dell[viii] and DFC Global[ix] in 2017, which provided a guidance regarding the conditions courts can accept the merger price as a basis for the fair price. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:59 am
In addressing commonality, the court applied the recent decision in Wal-mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]