Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 4,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that the United States Department of the Interior violated the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (“RRA”) by imposing price threshold conditions that require federal lessees to pay royalties when commodity prices rise. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:15 am by Antonio Curvello
This focus is particularly alarming for international companies with subsidiaries in Brazil because Brazil’s IP royalty remittance laws directly conflict with the United State’s transfer pricing policies. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm by Jonathan Moss
United States, 406 U.S. 128 (1972), applied; (2) determining, alternatively, that the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance set forth in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:47 am by Stone Law, P.C.
On June 13, 2013 the United Stated Supreme Court entered a unanimous ruling in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:44 am by luiza
Although Silver’s complaint included publicly available information, his personal knowledge of non-public information about defendant PharMerica’s pricing was critical to his allegations of fraudulent conduct. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 3:05 pm by Matthew Wild
  This legislation is remarkable in light of all the uproar over the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:47 am by Stone Law, P.C.
On June 13, 2013 the United Stated Supreme Court entered a unanimous ruling in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:55 pm
Filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the Complaint alleged that Herman Miller used its Suggested Retail Price policy to enforce a resale price maintenance scheme over the Aeron chairs. [read post]