Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 4,375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2021, 10:51 am by Ernesto Falcon
When we look back at the United States’ previous move from telecom monopoly into what can best be described as “regulated competition,” we can learn a lot of lessons—good and bad—about what can be done post-breakup. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Because the modern state is very complicated, there is nevertheless no precise definition of the scope of that foundation. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:53 am by Al Saikali
 The bill is largely a “cut-and-paste” of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), but in some ways, it goes further than the CCPA and would make Florida’s law the most aggressive privacy law in the United States. [read post]
” Perhaps viral video recordings of Black Americans being beaten, tortured, and executed only reinforce white supremacy in the United States? [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Given the dynamic pricing of most online advertising, with rates calculated on the basis of the demographics of the chosen advertising universe (such as age, sex, geography, interest, and purchasing patterns), passing along the costs of the tax to the advertisers themselves would be trivial for most advertising platforms, even if lawmakers also passed proposed legislation prohibiting platforms from adding a Maryland “surcharge” to advertising invoices, as has been proposed.[4]… [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:37 pm by Bona Law PC
In traditional markets, that is, non-platform markets, the value of the last unit consumed decreases. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am by Florian Mueller
Instead, Conti has now brought a new complaint specifically against Nokia in Delaware state court, and that one has the potential to become one of the most interesting FRAND cases worldwide (this post continues below the document):21-01-25 Continental v. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 11:22 am by Kenneth S. Nankin
§ 41713(b)(1), a provision of the Airline Deregulation Act, preempted the plaintiff’s unjust enrichment and money had and received causes of action because both were state law claims “related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers. [read post]