Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2010, 4:30 am
After remand from the Federal Circuit, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled that, due to the penal nature of the false marking statute, the appropriate penalty for marking a product with an incorrect or invalid patent number should be assessed at the maximum price the articles were sold, rather than the profit margin or economic benefit to the defendant. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:45 am
It shows the products that face the highest import and export tariffs in the United States, as well as the US-world price difference caused by those import barriers. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:35 pm
The general assertion that the defendants "conspired to coordinate potash prices and price increases so as to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price at which potash was sold in the United States at artificially inflated and anticompetitive levels" was wholly conclusory and insufficient to satisfy the pleading standards established by the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
On May 18, 2015, The Supreme Court of the United States (“Supreme Court”) reversed the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ (“9th Circuit”) ruling in Tibble et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified… [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:47 am
Healthcare facilities can’t bring False Claims Act lawsuits to enforce ceiling-price contracts between drug manufacturers and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, according to the United States Supreme Court in Astra USA v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:38 pm
The court refused to “disregard a decision of the United States Supreme Court and the numerous cases that have relied on it. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:56 pm
United States, 406 U.S. 128, 155 (1972). [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:53 am
While the "first sale" rule certainly applies to goods purchased within the United States and subsequently resold within the United States, at issue here is whether or not the rule applies to goods bought abroad and then resold in the United States, as Costco did in this case. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:47 am
United States, 76 Fed. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 7:36 am
The lawsuit is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:12 am
State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:12 am
28 U.S.C § 1498 (a) (Governmental Use) The United States (U.S.) does not have any provisions for a compulsory license. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 8:15 am
The petition in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:50 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has issued an important class certification decision, and it is not Dukes v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion last year in Waggoner v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:01 pm
Fox Business, The Willis Report, May 4, 2011 Host Gerri Willis http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/4677710 “We’re definitely losing some money through what’s called transfer pricing, where corporations operating in the United States, as well as other countries, find ways—legal ways typically—of locating their profits in countries that have lower tax rates. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 8:44 am
Morsell v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:30 pm
Miles was decided, the Court held in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
See Apple, Inc. v. [read post]