Search for: "Priests For Life v. HHS"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2020, 4:03 pm
The Obama administration adopted that phrase from Judge Pillard's decision in Priests for Life v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
On March 23, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inZubik v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:05 am
United States Navy (In re Navy Chaplaincy), 738 F.3d 425 (2013)In re Charges of Judicial Misconduct, 769 F.3d 762 (2014)* Priests for Life v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm
At issue was a RFRA challenge to the relocation of remains from a cemetery.Finally, Garland was a member of several en banc panels that ruled (either summarily or in opinions by others) on issues related to religious rights:In Priests for Life v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 11:50 pm
HHS, No. 13-5368, and Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
Canon 50 prohibited marriage in the 2nd and 3rd degrees of affinity and Canon 51 forbade clandestine marriages and priests witnessing such marriages, and provided that all marriages must be announced publicly by the priest in church so that legitimate impediments might be made known, and the priest was to investigate whether any impediment existed. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:54 am
Sure enough, a group called Priests for Life has filed suit against HHS claiming, among other things, that the relevant regulations are invalid under RFRA (See Count II). [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
Circuit granted an injunction pending appeal by a 2-1 vote (Judges Henderson and Brown, with Judge Tatel dissenting) in the consolidated Priests for Life and Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Washington cases; and the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
The Zubik petitioners, for instance--including Catholic University and Priests for Life, which use insured plans--told the Court (pp. 45-46):Petitioners do not seek to “dictate the conduct of the government or of third parties,” [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
That left open the question of the accommodation the ACA and Obama Administration crafted for religious nonprofits like the University of Notre Dame, Geneva College and Priests for Life. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
The last of the week’s re-runs is New Hampshire Right to Life v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
The rest of the cases, ranked in roughly descending order of the public-relations friendliness of their petitioners’ names (with ties broken by docket number), are Priests for Life v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:33 am
Take the religious objection to the federal minimum wage at issue in Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
In National Mining Association v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
As I noted in this post, five of the petitioners currently offer their employees participation in insured plans: Catholic University, Geneva College, Oklahoma Baptist University, Oklahoma Wesleyan University, and Priests for Life. [read post]
