Search for: "Procter & Gamble Co. v. Johnson & Johnson Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
Procter & Gamble Distributors, LLC, 766 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
(TTABlog) TTAB affirms refusal to register shape of temperature control device due to lack of acquired distinctiveness: In re Johnson Controls, Inc. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm by Bexis
Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2010 WL 768937, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am by Stefanie Levine
RE 39,947 owned by Johnson Research & Development Co., Inc. and entitled TOY WATER GUN. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Stefanie Levine
  Filed August 5, 2010 by The Procter & Gamble Company. (5)   95/001,416 (electronically filed) – U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(Spicy IP) ‘Tirupati laddus’ granted registration as a geographical indication (Spicy IP)   Malaysia Malaysian Federal Court: McDonald’s final defeat by McCurry in trade mark battle (IPKat)   Netherlands District Court of The Hague: Procter & Gamble companies win trade mark infringement summary proceedings brought by Debonairre against their Naomi Campbell product line (Class 46)   South Africa Copycat success -… [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 4:42 am
Inc., Procter & Gamble Distributing LLC, MZB Personal Care, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Nestle Inc. as defendants. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or… [read post]