Search for: "Propeller Company v. Company v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2010, 1:57 pm by Barry Herman
The Federal Circuit was scheduled to hear oral argument today in Deere & Company v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:34 pm
While this is not United States Supreme Court precedence, many industry experts believe it may be foreshadowing a similar ruling from the high court. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 9:31 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Lockheed Martin Corporation, one of the largest defense contractors in the United States, operated three California facilities that manufactured solid-propellant rockets for the United States Department of Defense pursuant to contracts subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulations. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Sean Wajert
On the merits of the reconsideration argument, the court said that the NJ holding was at odds with the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in World-Wide Volkswagen and Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:35 am by Mark S. Humphreys
As it relates to the use of the term "motor vehicle" in an insurance policy, the 1985, Fort Worth Court of Appeals case, Western Insurance Companies v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line." [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
Co. of Calif. (1974) 40 Cal.App.3d 841.), a telegraph company transmitting messages from one sender to another (Mason v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:05 pm by Whittel & Melton, LLC
The company had previously recalled five million vehicles in the United States for issues with Takata airbags. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Apps, 2nd Cir., decided 12/16/2009) In this case, the United States Court of Ap [read post]