Search for: "Propeller Company v. Company v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
End Citizens United had alleged Scott and the New Republican PAC, a group he formerly chaired, violated election laws prohibiting coordination between candidates and outside groups. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”[7] When that collision came, Adkins would be reversed, in West Coast Hotel Company v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Eric Turkewitz
After a brief discussion of the long-recognized rule of Frye v United States — in that expert testimony must be based on scientific principles or procedures and is admissible only after a principle or procedure has gained general acceptance in its specified field — the court swiftly deconstructed Dr. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
 For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 3:03 pm by John J. Malm
Malm contended that the vehicle manufacturer withheld important safety features such as dynamic stability control and traction control from a vehicle sold in the United States in order to place revenue over consumer safety. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am by Vishnu Kannan
  The Supreme Court’s application of Fourth Amendment protection to the attachment of a GPS tracking device to a car in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:40 pm
Propellant (APCP) litigation (Tripoli Rocketry Association and National Association of Rocketry v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:53 am by Rob Robinson
Segulah Advisor AB is the exclusive investment advisor to the funds Segulah IV, Segulah V and Segulah VI. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360)   Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango)   Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
Falk (Property, intangible) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of “A BRAND NAME LAW FIRM,” finding double entendre argument unappealing (TTABlog) Fame propels AUTOZONE to TTAB 2(d) victory in DENT ZONE cancellation: AutoZone Parts v Dent Zone Companies (TTABlog) TTAB affirms genericness refusal of FIREPOT for … guess what? [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
It is not the event itself but the abstraction of the event and its imagery that becomes the reality propelling consequential action. [read post]