Search for: "Propeller Company v. Company v. United States" Results 41 - 49 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Much of this information is contained in what is described as the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. [6] At some point, perhaps commencing before 1992 but certainly propelled by the 1992 changes, executive pay became subject to the so-called “ratcheting effect.” [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line." [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 1:57 pm by Barry Herman
The Federal Circuit was scheduled to hear oral argument today in Deere & Company v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:01 am
Article One of the Constitution provides that "The People's Republic of China is a socialist state under the people's democratic dictatorship. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:40 pm
Propellant (APCP) litigation (Tripoli Rocketry Association and National Association of Rocketry v. [read post]