Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent" Results 1 - 20 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2012, 2:16 pm by thehealthlawfirm
If an incorrect address is on file, a health provider risks losing the right to timely respond to an investigation or file an appeal. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:48 am by Steven M. Sweat
The Supreme Court of California ruled that balance billing is not allowed in the state in Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 151 This appeal considered whether non-clinically trained reception staff at an A & E department owed a tortious duty of care to the appellant to provide him with accurate information regarding waiting times. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck discusses the amicus brief that he filed on behalf of former officials of the Department of Health and Human Services in Armstrong v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm by Law Lady
The Department of Health and Human Services said the increase would bring service fees for Medicaid primary care in line with those paid by Medicare. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:48 am by Steven M. Sweat
The Supreme Court of California ruled that balance billing is not allowed in the state in Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The attorney also indicated that she expected Petitioner to provide any documents in the Respondent's possession that were relevant to any issues in the proceedings.The Appellate Division noted that the record contains numerous documents indicating that Petitioner held herself out as interim director of the health department and that Petitioner admitted in her testimony that at times she had done so. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Further, ALJ Gloade was not persuaded that Anonymous’ mental health prevented her from responding to department notices or reporting to work for over 13 months. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Sutter Health, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Mar. 5, 2008), the plaintiff challenged the defendant's failure to disclose its practice of providing discounts, on request, to customers who timely paid their bills in full. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In any event, §72.1 vests such decision making in "a medical officer selected by the civil service department or municipal commission having jurisdiction," and requires the appointing authority to provide "[w]ritten notice of the facts providing the basis for the judgment of the appointing authority that the employee is not fit to perform the duties of his or her position ... be provided to the employee and the civil… [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In any event, §72.1 vests such decision making in "a medical officer selected by the civil service department or municipal commission having jurisdiction," and requires the appointing authority to provide "[w]ritten notice of the facts providing the basis for the judgment of the appointing authority that the employee is not fit to perform the duties of his or her position ... be provided to the employee and the civil… [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 10:32 pm by Kirk Jenkins
In the final days of the March term, the Illinois Supreme Court granted review in Home Star Bank & Financial Services v. [read post]