Search for: "Provident Institution v. Massachusetts"
Results 221 - 240
of 675
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2008, 9:43 pm
For example, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ("MIT") uses a Creative Commons public license for an OpenCourseWare project that licenses all 1800 MIT courses. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
Stern School of Business, David Simchi-Levi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) – School of Engineering, Yining Wang, University of Florida – Warrington College of Business Administration The ʻRight to be Forgottenʼ beyond the EU: An Analysis of Wider G20 Regulatory Action and Potential Next Steps, University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 33/2020, David Erdos, University of Cambridge – Faculty of Law; Trinity Hall. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Por: Víctor Manuel Guízar López INTERNET HAS BECOME A TOOL THAT HAS UNIMAGINABLY REDESIGNED THE MEANS BY WHICH HUMAN BEINGS COMMUNICATE AND HAS TURNED OUT TO BE THE PURE EMBODIMENT OF GLOBALIZATION. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:48 am
[T]he finding of probability of success did not respect the deference Massachusetts law requires as to the choices of student discipline proceedings made by private academic institutions. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 11:03 am
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 479 Mass. 436 (2018), (another case handled by HBMHlaw), the attorneys at HBMHlaw believe the evidence will show that Harvard and its employees failed to take reasonable and appropriate steps to prevent this tragedy. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am
Mariam Morshedi provides a graphic explainer for the case at Subscript Law. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:38 pm
It constitutes an institution involving the highest interests of society. [read post]
17 May 2014, 8:06 am
” To read more on this case, please read the Estate of Steven Gavin v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
The Brown Court burrowed into the psychological effects of "separate but equal" on black schoolchildren rather than relying on the formal distinction of equal facilities; the Court in US v Virginia struck down the male-only policy of the Virginia Military Institute because a proposed separate women's leadership institute could not provide the same type of rigorous military training, facilities, courses, faculty, financial opportunities, and alumni… [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
Mark Walsh provides a “view” from the courtroom for this blog. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
Kappos (Patent Docs) US: New York Times provides soapbox for data exclusivity critics (Patent Docs) US: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dismissed as party in RNAi dispute: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften e V et al v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research et al (Patent Docs) US: Cordis awarded fees and costs in surgical device suit: Marctec v Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corporation (Patent Docs)… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
Kappos (Patent Docs) US: New York Times provides soapbox for data exclusivity critics (Patent Docs) US: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dismissed as party in RNAi dispute: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften e V et al v Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research et al (Patent Docs) US: Cordis awarded fees and costs in surgical device suit: Marctec v Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corporation (Patent Docs)… [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:16 am
” Justice Black characterized the institution in 1971 in his dissenting opinion in Meltzer v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
Meserve, President, Carnegie Institution for Science, and former Chairman, U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 10:37 am
After Lopez (and United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm
The Clean Air Act is the primary statutory authority under which EPA regulates greenhouse gas emissions, as the Supreme Court itself acknowledged in Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Think of Walz v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
