Search for: "Prue v. Prue" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court denied Petitioner's CPLR Article 78 petition and dismissed the proceeding.The Appellate Division subsequently affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, opining that although an administrative determination may be annulled when it "was made in violation of lawful procedure [or] was affected by an error of law" there were no relevant issues of fact that would have necessitated a post-termination hearing, citing Prue v Hunt , 78 NY2d 364. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court denied Petitioner's CPLR Article 78 petition and dismissed the proceeding.The Appellate Division subsequently affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, opining that although an administrative determination may be annulled when it "was made in violation of lawful procedure [or] was affected by an error of law" there were no relevant issues of fact that would have necessitated a post-termination hearing, citing Prue v Hunt , 78 NY2d 364. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 8:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division agreed citing Matter of Economico v Village of Pelham (50 NY2d 120, overruled on other grounds Matter of Prue v Hunt, 78 NY2d 364). [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Citing Economico v Village of Pelham, 50 NY2d 120 [overruled on other grounds, Matter of Prue v Hunt, 78 NY2d 364], the Appellate Division considered the allegation that the employee's termination was in contravention of his rights under a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 10:42 am
Prue, the plaintiffs, a First Nations group, required a band council resolution in order to launch the action. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 1:14 pm by F. Tim Knight
” In Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm by Andrew Langille
Prue about his motivations in championing this issue.Is Tip Theft a Problem in Ontario's Labour Market? [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 7:52 am
I must, of course, leave this rather long post with a bit of Shakespeare - Henry V: O noble English! [read post]