Search for: "Pruitt v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2011, 10:33 am
Western States Medical Center, 535 U.S. 357 (2002).Masoudi & Pruitt, “The Food & Drug Administration v. [read post]
Trial Court Loses Jurisdiction After Judgment Entered - Order Enforcing Settlement Agreement Quashed
17 Nov 2011, 7:48 am
Harpster, 438 So. 2d 165, 168 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); see also Pruitt v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm
State, 2011 Fla. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:27 pm
In doing some browsing I came across a copy of the Article 32, UCMJ, IO report in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:19 am
For instance, in the case of Pruitt v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 6:26 am
For instance, in the case of Pruitt v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:14 am
The August 4, 2010 South Carolina Court of Appeals opinion in Pruitt v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
Pruitt's work seeks to revive legal consideration of spatial variations in provision of government services, a concern that waned following the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in San Antonio Independent Schools v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:18 pm
In Simmons v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 4:00 pm
Therefore, in my view, this would unduly burden the defendant's federal and state constitutional rights, which prohibit the use of truly involuntarily obtained statements, by requiring the defendant to forfeit state statutory rights in order to protect constitutional ones. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Pruitt (California-Davis) (below right). [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:54 am
Rick Kittel and KU Defender Project student Sebastien Orosco won in State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:53 pm
State – Death Penalty RehearingBy Matt TaitIn Pruitt v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:32 am
The state fares worse in State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:31 am
However, there is a lingering concern that State legislators, having already raided the tobacco trust fund to meet State budget shortfalls, would be tempted to do the same with Court trust funds. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Pruitt Eastern District of Tennessee at Greeneville 08b0016p.06 In re: Bettye Zwosta v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 10:38 am
See Pruitt v. [read post]
