Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2025, 3:34 pm
In recent years, the Department of Justice has prosecuted public officials in high profile cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:05 am
The Trump Administration has been on a firing spree inside the Department of Justice. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 7:01 am
” A 1988 Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel memo on the presidential veto power states there is “no textual source in the Constitution for any inherent authority [of the president] to impound. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 11:03 am
In Attorney General v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 10:26 pm
The lawsuit seeks an injunction against the Department of Justice’s guidance.2025-01-31 Immigration and CitizenshipExecutive Action: Immigration Policy – “Expedited Removal” (Executive Order)Make the Road New York v. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 6:57 am
In Plyer v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 3:58 pm
On Friday, the Department of Justice Civil Division filed at least four briefs opposing motions for preliminary injunctions in those suits: New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 6:03 am
See Yelling v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 6:03 am
But I think federal government pressure aimed at getting such intermediaries to restrict speech does violate the Constitution (see NRA v. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 4:23 pm
They reported that this situation had led to a public health emergency and resulted in considerable distress and potential danger to citizens’ safety. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 12:43 pm
The right of public employees to speak their minds on matters of public concern is so messy even unpublished cases draw dissents. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 6:48 am
Mehta and Kaitlyn Box, Jan. 28, 2025 "On January 23, 2025, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Benjamine C. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 12:26 pm
The lawsuit seeks an injunction against the Department of Justice’s guidance. 3. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
The Court nonetheless affirmed because dismissal would be "an affront to our sense of justice and cannot be countenanced" (id. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
The Court nonetheless affirmed because dismissal would be "an affront to our sense of justice and cannot be countenanced" (id. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:57 am
Indeed, Roberts relied heavily on Justice Robert Jackson’s concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:51 am
The Justice Department contends the plaintiffs misread the intent of the Wong Kim Ark decision. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 12:56 pm
The concrete steps the Department of Justice has now taken, however, go far beyond what the law permits. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:47 am
And indeed the noted Murthy v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:03 am
Justice Department (DOJ) filed last August against the real-estate software provider RealPage, as well as a report issued last month by the White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) claiming to find $3.8 billion in consumer harms in the rental-housing market arising from the use of algorithmic-pricing tools, both stand as stark examples of the kinds of fundamental misunderstandings of both artificial-intelligence (AI) tools and market dynamics that the incoming administration… [read post]