Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2025, 11:07 am
" Ultimately, Judge Ho found that he "cannot force the Department of Justice to prosecute a defendant" and did not have the authority "to appoint an independent prosecutor" which precluded him from denying the Department of Justice's motion to dismiss. [read post]
9 Jun 2025, 11:17 am
In Friday's AP v. [read post]
9 Jun 2025, 7:00 am
” Exceptions determined by the attorney general, in coordination with the secretary of state and the secretary of homeland security for foreign nationals whose travel is determined to “advance a critical United States national interest involving the Department of Justice. [read post]
9 Jun 2025, 5:28 am
(citing Department of Justice v. [read post]
9 Jun 2025, 4:00 am
Here on the blog last week, I expressed puzzlement over the Department of Justice's investigation into allegations that the Harvard Law Review (HLR) has been practicing race-based and sex-based affirmative action for some of its membership slots and in its selection of articles for publication. [read post]
8 Jun 2025, 6:00 am
Helping citizens understand the electoral process, ensuring they are informed, and promoting civic engagement are fundamental components of a strong, participatory democracy. [read post]
6 Jun 2025, 1:51 pm
In our comments, we explained that surveillance of even public-facing social media can implicate privacy interests by aggregating a wealth of information about both an applicant for immigration benefits, and also people in their networks, including U.S. citizens. [read post]
5 Jun 2025, 12:09 pm
(a) It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks and other national security or public-safety threats. [read post]
5 Jun 2025, 11:55 am
And even if that effort-free collapse were possible, the post-despotic renewal that everyone should desire can only become a reality through active engagement, not by sitting and hoping for the best.In the first part of my Dorf on Law column on Tuesday of this week, I addressed the question of whether the people who flee a deteriorating country are failing their fellow citizens. [read post]
4 Jun 2025, 9:13 pm
As interpreted by the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
4 Jun 2025, 9:01 pm
The “Restoration of the Professional Civil Service”Trump dismissed officials in justice, the security services, the inspectors general of sixteen executive departments, the general counsels of the military services, and has purged those whose prior conduct in office or whose political sentiments are inimical to him. [read post]
3 Jun 2025, 8:26 am
Louisiana, or Justice John Paul Stevens speaking “in a slow, halting voice, periodically getting tangled up in thickets of words like ‘corporation’ and ‘corruption’” during his oral dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Jun 2025, 9:01 pm
Over the weekend, the Department of Homeland Security posted the following news release on its webpage: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) secured [on Friday] a legal victory in its effort to terminate parole for more than 530,000 illegal aliens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela (CHNV) who were released into the country by the Biden Administration. [read post]
31 May 2025, 1:09 pm
Dep't of Justice (termination of grants to the ABA; D. [read post]
30 May 2025, 11:27 am
The Sotomayor Concurrence – the Agency’s Organic Statute and Case Precedent Control Associate Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor in her concurring opinion that took a different approach to reach the same conclusion as the majority. [read post]
30 May 2025, 10:22 am
There is some question of how to square this robust articulation of deference with last year’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
29 May 2025, 6:17 pm
Justice Brandeis. [read post]
29 May 2025, 12:25 pm
Public Citizen and Metropolitan Edison v. [read post]
27 May 2025, 8:39 am
Army, State Department, and a report released by a Defense agency in the course of the litigation.See also Rahman v. [read post]
27 May 2025, 7:27 am
On Jan. 28, 2025, the Justice Department voluntarily dismissed its case. [read post]
