Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 341 - 360
of 1,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:46 am
Ct. 1878 (1994), the Court held that a public hospital employee could be fired for criticizing her department, because the state’s interest in the efficient operation of the hospital outweighed the employee’s free expression rights. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm
The Justice Department's petition for writ sounds like something straight out of The Wire and has set the legal industry abuzz. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
It has been established since Re Haughey[1971] I.R. 217, the classical statement of constitutional justice, that any public inquiry impugning a citizen’s right to a good name is amenable to judicial review, and therefore attracts the rule against bias as well as the audi alteram partem (‘fair hearing’) rule. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am
The justices also are considering two other questions: whether Mesa can be sued if he did not know at the time of the shooting that Hernandez was not a U.S. citizen; and whether Hernandez’s parents can rely on a 1971 case, Bivens v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 10:06 am
Department of Justice separately moved to vacate the stay.[17] The Department of Justice argued that the plaintiffs did not prove they had standing, request the stay, or show they would be likely to succeed on the merits or would suffer irreparable harm.[18] The Department of Justice further argued that the PIP process was legal because “Congress vested discretionary unreviewable parole authority in the Secretary, the Secretary established… [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 5:16 am
As Jesse Eisinger portrays Preet Bharara in his upcoming book, “The Chickenshit Club: Why the Justice Department Fails to Prosecute Executives,” he was a show pony who adored the spotlight and went for the low hanging fruit to become a public darling. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
The Court drew comfort from the decision in R (AHK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1117 (Admin), [2012] ACD 66 in which Ouseley J held that the fact that the open material in an immigration judicial review did not provide a sustainable reason for the decisions in question in AHK would not lead to the decisions being quashed. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
As noted above, similar questions were considered in Lumba, and also in the more recent case of R (Kambadzi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 1 WLR 1299, which was the subject of a [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:46 am
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:42 am
Among the new material is a discussion of the state attorney general’s office concerns about Judge Sumi.Steve Means, the No. 3 official at the state Department of Justice, said the agency and GOP Attorney General J.B. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 230 (1979) (Fifth Amendment violation based on discrimination in public employment); Carlson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 230 (1979) (Fifth Amendment violation based on discrimination in public employment); Carlson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
Passman, 442 U.S. 228, 230 (1979) (Fifth Amendment violation based on discrimination in public employment); Carlson v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am
In Gundy v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:44 am
First Justice of the Quincy Div. of the District Court Department, Diorio contends that OpenCourt's broadcast of his arraignment and archiving of the footage violated his constitutional right to a fair trial because identification would be an issue at the trial. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:21 am
” The department cited United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:01 am
Rumsfled and the dissenting opinion of Justice Scalia, which Justice Stevens joined in Hamdi v. [read post]
