Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,074
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
West v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:18 am
From Justice Barrett's unanimous opinion this morning in Lindke v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
In every generation, a crisis comes to a country that becomes a seminal global public event and engages our life’s work of advancing international law. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm
Some legal terms used in our Minnesota criminal justice system are difficult for people to understand. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Richardson Citizen Award for Open Government. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Preclearance by the Justice Department under the Voting Rights Act’s Section 5 had the biggest impact until it was demolished by the Supreme Court in Shelby County. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) (here). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
The Justice Department leaves little doubt why they pursued Baker. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
In the British system, "all the king's subjects" could be impeached, including private citizens. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am
New York and 335-7 LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Department of State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
A “national of the United States” is defined as “(A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
In fact, the Department of Justice's own Justice Manual provides that a writ of mandamus is an "extraordinary remedy, which should only be used in exceptional circumstances of peculiar emergency or public importance. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
United States and, most recently, in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm
" Then, after the district court denied the Plaintiffs/Appellants' initial preliminary injunction, Governor DeSantis tweeted that the Department of Justice "sided with Communist China against Florida's law prohibiting CCP-tied entities from buying land in Florida…. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]