Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice" Results 61 - 80 of 2,069
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am by Beatrice Yahia
Eight other U.S. citizens are still believed to be in captivity. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:58 am by Amy Howe
On Nov. 29, the justices will hear oral argument in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am by Elizabeth Goitein
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm by Stephen Halbrook
In a previous post, I wrote about the attempt by Merrick Garland's Justice Department in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm by David Kopel
The Department of Justice's rejection of these laws in Supreme Court briefing is purely tactical; in lower courts, the DOJ continues to claim that old laws that were rejected by subsequent constitutional enactments are still valid precedents for modern gun controls. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Texas and the other states relied on the "independent state legislature" (ISL) theory that had been tentatively launched by Chief Justice Rehnquist in his concurrence (joined by Justices Scalia and Thomas) in Bush v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:50 am by Annie Shiel
This means that not only is there no public transparency or oversight around the use of force by the CIA, but also that civilians harmed in CIA operations have no way to seek answers, redress, or justice. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am by Amy Howe
The justices will kick off the November argument session with Culley v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Chief Justice John Roberts’s opinion for six justices in Harvard and five justices in UNC is not crystal clear, but a holding can be gleaned from the following. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am by David Kopel
However, several amici in support of the Solicitor General, as well as the Department of Justice in cases in lower courts, also rely on old laws based on invidious discrimination–such as against Catholics, slaves, free people of color, and so on. [read post]