Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice" Results 81 - 100 of 2,054
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The Advocate General of the European Court of Justice has delivered his non-binding legal opinion in Schrems v. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:04 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] EWHC 2818 (Admin) (High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, before Collins J), Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm by Bethany Berger
With a three-justice plurality opinion, a two-justice concurrence in the judgment and two dissents, Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
” The Privacy Shield aims to address the requirements set out by the European Court of Justice in its Oct. 6, 2015 ruling by imposing stronger obligations on companies, providing stronger monitoring and enforcement by the DOC and Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and making commitments regarding access to information on the part of public authorities. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:08 am by Kaylan Phillips
The foundation filed cert-stage and merits-stage amicus briefs in support of the government in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 1:30 pm
The question before the justices was whether the state of Texas could deny undocumented students the right to a free public education that U.S. citizens and legally admitted immigrants received. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:44 am by Rory Little
United States), that the Justices were simply tired from the first argument, in Yates v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 12:25 pm by jefhenninger
Misconduct in office or official misconduct has been defined as “unlawful behavior in relation to official duties by an officer entrusted with the administration of justice or who is in breach of a duty of public concern in a public office. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:28 am
Since all defendants are Connecticut citizens and residents, specifically Connecticut public entities and their employees, venue does not lie under 28 U.S. [read post]