Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2017, 2:22 pm
The third and final CVSG, in Washington Department of Licensing v. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 8:10 pm
v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:08 am
Therefore, we were forced to file a lawsuit, Brennan Center for Justice v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
They need to protect their citizens and not the criminals. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 9:02 am
On September 16, 2015, the federal government decided to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada the case of Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Relying on the federal government’s “preeminent authority” over immigration, the Justice Department on Tuesday asked a federal judge to bar enforcement of Arizona’s new law seeking to round up non-citizens illegally in that state. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:45 am
An application for such removal may be made by any citizen resident of such town, village, improvement district or fire district or by the district attorney of the county in which such town, village or district is located, and shall be made to the appellate division of the supreme court held within the judicial department embracing such town, village, improvement district or fire district. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:02 am
Department of Public Health (798 N.E.2d 941, Mass. 2003) that the state constitution guaranteed gay couples the right to marry. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:02 am
Department of Public Health (798 N.E.2d 941, Mass. 2003) that the state constitution guaranteed gay couples the right to marry. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm
(Mossoff, 4) ("[A] public right is a privilege granted to or created in a citizen 'in connection with the performance of the constitutional functions of the executive or legislative departments.' ") (quoting Crowell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm
(Mossoff, 4) ("[A] public right is a privilege granted to or created in a citizen 'in connection with the performance of the constitutional functions of the executive or legislative departments.' ") (quoting Crowell v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
In Monday’s argument in Nieves v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
As if Michael Gove MP needed further reminding, in wake of Colin Yeo’s appearance on World at One on Wednesday where he pointed out the fundamental error of the Justice Secretary’s assertion that Britain cannot deport EEA nationals with a criminal record, the Supreme Court in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 16 makes clear that EEA nationals can be deported by virtue of the Immigration (European Economic Area)… [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:34 pm
In Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 9:24 am
Or of course the society could host a series just on Jackson the Supreme Court justice, a dissenter from the infamous Korematsu v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:04 pm
Michigan v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:24 pm
See Public Access Shoreline Hawaii v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 7:30 am
The Privacy Shield replaced the Safe Harbor agreement after the European Court of Justice invalidated that accord in Schrems v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
[Justice Gorsuch does not agree with, or even cite, Reed v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:14 pm
Antitrust Compliance Programs in the US and the European Union But make no mistake––not any antitrust compliance policy is sufficient to convince the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ) that you are a good corporate citizen. [read post]
