Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2018, 8:45 am
An application for such removal may be made by any citizen resident of such town, village, improvement district or fire district or by the district attorney of the county in which such town, village or district is located, and shall be made to the appellate division of the supreme court held within the judicial department embracing such town, village, improvement district or fire district. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:02 am
Department of Public Health (798 N.E.2d 941, Mass. 2003) that the state constitution guaranteed gay couples the right to marry. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
[Justice Gorsuch does not agree with, or even cite, Reed v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm
The post Utah v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:34 pm
In Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm
(Mossoff, 4) ("[A] public right is a privilege granted to or created in a citizen 'in connection with the performance of the constitutional functions of the executive or legislative departments.' ") (quoting Crowell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:04 pm
Michigan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:18 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court engaged deeply in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm
Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 12:56 pm
” In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
The Department of Justice (DOJ) offers Kamal-Griffin v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 7:30 am
The Privacy Shield replaced the Safe Harbor agreement after the European Court of Justice invalidated that accord in Schrems v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
Commissioner of Public Health) back to the legislature. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Here is what Justice Ginsburg wrote: Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:03 am
Montana Department of Revenue, will – among other things – put this claim to the test. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:35 am
But Bannon’s position as a private citizen does not, in the Justice Department’s view, automatically negate any application of executive privilege. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 8:51 am
First, Nosal pushes forward the trend that began in 2013 when the Department of Justice announced that trade secret prosecutions would become an area of emphasis. [read post]
