Search for: "Public Service Coordinated Transport v. the United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm
(a) In General- Chapter 401 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: `Sec. 40130. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
-EU Mutual Legal Assistance Agreement, providing that the costs associated with establishing and servicing a video-conference for mutual legal assistance purposes, as well as the allowances and expenses related to travel of persons in relation to such video-conferences, will be borne by the Requesting State unless otherwise agreed. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Arctic Research Board (United States Access Board). [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 8:22 am
(Eugene Volokh) From BART, a San Francisco-area public transportation agency:Organizers planning to disrupt BART service on August 11, 2011 stated they would use mobile devices to coordinate their disruptive activities and communicate about the location and number of BART Police. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
A nine-member board, chaired by the Chief Justice of the United States, determines its basic policies. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:10 pm
Courts all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States have held that even a small amount of work that directly affects the safety of motor vehicles traveling on public highways that transport goods or people in interstate (or international) commerce is enough to trigger the exemption. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm
Because Morris involved transportation of goods not passengers, the Third Circuit looked at cases arising in other contexts that defined interstate transportation of passengers, including United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:41 pm
Department of Transportation (DOT) today proposed to deny an application for antitrust immunity made by Delta Air Lines and affiliates of the Virgin Blue Group with respect to joint services between the United States and Australia. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
The law stipulates that 75% of shares and personnel within the maritime services and auxiliary fuel distribution sector be sourced domestically. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm
Services must be provided by individuals licensed by the state to provide personal care services, or in a manner that is otherwise consistent with state requirements. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 11:19 am
”21 In the course of enacting section 54957.95, the Legislature declared its intent not to prohibit criticism of the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the agency, or of the acts or omissions of the legislative body, as provided for in section 54954.3(c).22 In addition, the Legislature declared its intent to “codify the authority and standards for governing public meetings in accordance with Acosta v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 2:23 pm
In a public gathering after his swearing in and before a large popular gathering, Mr. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:00 am
Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx today announced a final rule for the safe transportation of flammable liquids by rail. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 8:49 am
State Legislative Developments States continued to pursue and enact new laws affecting the development, distribution and/or use of AI, expanding the legal patchwork of AI laws across the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 7:52 am
Wyndham v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
