Search for: "Pullman-Standard v. Swint" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Eugene Volokh] May Beauty Pageants Limit Themselves to "Natural Born Women"?
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
See e.g., Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Layoff of personnel in the event of a reduction of force by public employers in the State of New York
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Layoff of personnel in the event of a reduction of force by public employers in the State of New York
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Basic elements to be considered by employers and employees in the event of a layoff of personnel employed by New York State and its political subdivisions
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Basic elements to be considered by employers and employees in the event of a layoff of personnel employed by New York State and its political subdivisions
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Nebraska regulators retaliated against financial adviser for anti-Obama speech (and for publicly offering $100 ‘towards the purchase of a firearm’ as a bonus to customers)
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am by Eugene Volokh
From a panel decision Bennie v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Teva Pharma. v. Sandoz: SCOTUS finds claim construction subject to de novo OR clear error standard of review
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
” Pullman-Standard v. [read post]
Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society - http://jptos.org