Search for: "Purdy v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2011, 4:52 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am
W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam). [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:08 am
Purdy v Public Adm'r of the County of Westchester, 72 NY2d at 9 - "[the patient] could come and go as she pleased"). [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:46 am
Purdy, 367 F. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:30 am
The author describes a `blond girl’ who is `fairly new and so a little nervous,’ and states: `If you are gentle and kind to her I'm sure you're going to have a very good time. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm
” Purdy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 pm
Responsiveness v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
Related PostsOctober 20, 2009 -- Purdy and Assisted Suicide in the Northern Ireland Assembly (2) [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:11 am
Purdy (1979) 91 Cal.App.3d 942, 947. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:00 pm
” Louisiana Associated General Contractors v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
This matter has come under detailed judicial debate in both the Pretty and the Purdy cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
” Likewise, in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:14 pm
” Purdy v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:18 am
Purdy (wow, this list is a blast from the past!). [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
As J noted, there are indications in Purdy that Royales with (or without) cheese may be the Supreme Court’s preference, but it has yet to rule again on mandatory possession proceedings. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
You can watch the final, unique proceedings on ParliamentLive. 30 July: appeal hearings Joint appeal hearings from 10.30am and 2pm on the right of appeal against the Home Office's refusal to revoke a deportation order from within the UK: BA (Nigeria) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) and others PE (Cameroon) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) (Consolidated Appeals) 30 July:… [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:43 am
See Purdy v. [read post]
