Search for: "Putnam v. Day"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2013, 6:25 am
** See, also, Matter of Brown v Board of Educ. of the Mahopac Cent. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 2:01 pm
In Sibrizzi v Mount Tom Day School, the First Department held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion for a change of venue given its finding that plaintiffs' occupancy of a relative's home in the Bronx while their Westchester home was being renovated indicated a lack of intent to remain in the Bronx. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm
Schilderung aus US-Anwaltssicht mit Hinweis auf die wesentlichen Rechtsbegriffe und Gesetze; für viele US-Anwälte – so die Erfahrung von NIETZER & HÄUSLER – allerdings ein unbekanntes Feld: Enforcing International Judgments,by Houston Putnam Lowry It had the appearances of an ordinary day. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:02 am
Wager v Pelham Union Free Sch. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:14 am
" The Board noted that, when a specific day is not given, the USPTO, for examination purposes, presumes that the first use date is the last day of the month stated. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:20 am
Putnam Supreme converted the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment and granted the motion. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:15 am
In September, we hosted a Constitution Day event with a presentation by Professor Samantha Barbas from the University at Buffalo on Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
The case, Waples v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 9:01 am
In Sibrizzi v Mount Tom Day School, the First Department held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion for a change of venue given its finding that plaintiffs’ occupancy of a relative’s home in the Bronx while their Westchester home was being renovated indicated a lack of intent to remain in the Bronx. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 12:20 am
Dunne PUTNAM COUNTYCriminal PracticeVacatur of Conviction Denied; Witness' Recantation Not Found to Be Newly Discovered Evidence People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
That's the question presented in Hartney Fuel Oil Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 7:25 am
Kairis, Jones Day, Columbus, for Appellants NCAA and Notre Dame. [read post]
12 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Do we start having to count the days? [read post]
12 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Do we start having to count the days? [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 2:26 pm
In petitioner’s application there was a claim for use of the trademark in commerce in October 2014 (no day was indicated). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:52 pm
Warner v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:09 pm
., Petitioner-Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:11 am
Putnam’s Sons as the publisher of Fanny Hill. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
Putnam, 656 So. 2d 460, 462 (Fla. 1995) (recognizing that the elective share statutes “suggest a strong public policy in favor of protecting a surviving spouse’s right to receive an elective share” (quoting Putnam v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 9:46 am
Whren v U.S., 517 US 806; People v Robinson, 97 NY2d 341. [read post]
