Search for: "Quaid v. State"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2019, 6:16 am
Quaid Software Ltd. 847 F.2d 255 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Decided: June 20, 1988 Vault Corporation was a manufacturer of floppy […] [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Medtronic v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:41 pm
Medtronic v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:30 pm
The star studded cast of witnesses includes Dennis Quaid (whom I imagine will speak to the heparin overdose of his twins), William Maisel, (Medical Device Safety Institute), Aaron Kesselheim (Harvard Medical School's Division of Pharmacoepidemiology), David Kessler (former FDA head), David Vladeck, (Georgetown law professor who has written on preemption) Gregory Curfman (New England Journal of Medicine editor); Christine Ruther (drug company consultant) and State… [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:30 pm
The star studded cast of witnesses includes Dennis Quaid (whom I imagine will speak to the heparin overdose of his twins), William Maisel, (Medical Device Safety Institute), Aaron Kesselheim (Harvard Medical School's Division of Pharmacoepidemiology), David Kessler (former FDA head), David Vladeck, (Georgetown law professor who has written on preemption) Gregory Curfman (New England Journal of Medicine editor); Christine Ruther (drug company consultant) and State… [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:46 pm
Supreme Court's ruling in Riegel v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 12:50 pm
But, critically, the initial stop must have been justified under Terry v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
As a counterpoint to the above links, on his People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 10:37 am
Quaid Software Ltd., 847 F.2d 255, 268-70 (5th Cir. 1988). [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 10:03 am
Muhammad Al-Quaid, FA1208001456432 (Nat. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
This doctrine was established in the 1920 United States Supreme Court case Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 12:23 am
In a third case, in Vault Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cir. 2007): Gamco alleged infringement by Multimedia’s central determinant system, as operated in the New York State Lottery. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
The original claim named three parties: 1) a production company (The Quaid Project Ltd); 2) Mr. [read post]
