Search for: "Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co" Results 1 - 20 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) affirmed the examiner’s rejection, relying on Supreme Court decisions in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 12:13 am by Eleonora Rosati
 Nearly a decade later, the US Supreme Court in Qualitex Co v Jacobson Products Co, Inc, held that there existed no objection to the use of color alone as a trade mark, when the colour has attained a secondary meaning and therefore identifies and distinguishes a particular brand. [read post]
9 May 2016, 3:17 am
Jacobson Products Co., Inc., 514 U.S. 159, 34 USPQ2d 1161, 1163-64 (1995) and Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:17 am by Kenneth Kunkle
Color Trademarks The leading case involving color as a trademark is  Qualitex Co. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 9:17 am by Kenneth Kunkle
The leading case involving color as a trademark is  Qualitex Co. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:22 am by Jani
Syal could face a civil action for the infringement of that trademark or its possible dilution.Great flavors can lead to unpleasant results, no matter how deliciousAs was seen in Qualitex v Jacobson Products, discussed by Justice Costa in the case at hand, a trademark can potentially be "...almost anything at all that is capable of carrying meaning" - even a flavor, at least prima facie, as long as it indicates a source for the goods: "[T]he essence… [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:05 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Jacobson Products Co., the U.S. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am by Rachael Dyer
On appeal, the Circuit Court found that the District Court’s decision was inconsistent with a Supreme Court Judgement in Qualitex Co. v Jacobson Products Co. 514 U.S. 159, 162 (1995) and that the previous court was incorrect because Louboutin’s red soles have the requisite "distinctiveness" to merit trade mark protection. [read post]