Search for: "Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
For example, in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
For example, in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm
Jacobson Products Co., 514 U. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 11:20 pm
” Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
Similarly, the Court embraced the previously defunct argument that the single color of a product is not capable of protection because of the risk of "shade confusion," which argument had been explicitly rejected by the Supreme Court in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Jacobson Products Co., and so the lower court erred by resting its denial of Louboutin's preliminary injunction motion on that ground, the Second Circuit said. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Jacobson Products Co, 514 U.S. 159 (1995). [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
” Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
First, the Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:59 am
Supp. 2d 445, 451, 457 (S.D.N.Y. 2011), is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Jacobson Products Co., and that the district court therefore erred by resting its denial of Louboutin’s preliminary injunction motion on that ground. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 10:46 am
Jacobson Products Co., and that the district court therefore erred by resting its denial of Louboutin’s preliminary injunction motion on that ground. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:22 am
Syal could face a civil action for the infringement of that trademark or its possible dilution.Great flavors can lead to unpleasant results, no matter how deliciousAs was seen in Qualitex v Jacobson Products, discussed by Justice Costa in the case at hand, a trademark can potentially be "...almost anything at all that is capable of carrying meaning" - even a flavor, at least prima facie, as long as it indicates a source for the goods: "[T]he essence… [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:13 am
[20] Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:39 pm
Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:35 am
See Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
In Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 12:13 am
Nearly a decade later, the US Supreme Court in Qualitex Co v Jacobson Products Co, Inc, held that there existed no objection to the use of color alone as a trade mark, when the colour has attained a secondary meaning and therefore identifies and distinguishes a particular brand. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
But the United States Supreme Court held in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:02 pm
Marketing Displays Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 58 USPQ2d 1001, 1006 (2001), citing Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
