Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 81 - 100
of 4,471
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2016, 5:17 pm
Filed: 02/10/2016Case No: 3:16-cv-00246 QOTD Film Investment Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 10:51 am
Thomas Alured Faunce and Brendan Siles (Australian National University and Australian National University - ANU College of Law) have posted High Court of Australia and HIV/AIDS Disease Criminalisation: Aubrey V the Queen and Zaburoni V the Queen ((2017) 25 JLM... [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:23 pm
These cameras are often very useful in criminal investigations in England.The post The Queen v Scott and Dyer, Part 2: A Sabbatical in England appeared first on Samuels Yoelin Kantor LLP.. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:36 am
These directions derived from Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168 and Regina v Powell and English [1999] 1 AC 1 and the Supreme Court and Privy Council had to decide whether the common law had taken a wrong turning in these cases. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 8:06 pm
But at least for now, in Queens County (NY), different rules apply to same-sex surviving spouses. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:07 am
Metropolitan International Schools Ltd v Designtechnica Corporation and Others Queen’s Bench Division “An internet search engine was not a publisher at common law. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:00 am
The recent case of Morano v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 9:40 am
The Second Circuit in Chloé v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
The case of Antle v The Queen, 2009 TCC 465, 2010 FCA 280 (Can LII) (“Antle”) has been a much talked about decision. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 11:22 am
Brown (Queen's University Belfast - School of Law and Queen's University Belfast - School of Law) have posted Disability and Access to Sex Workers: Secretary of State for Justice v A Local Authority and others... [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 8:05 am
(Kolt) (321665 Alberta Ltd. v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:13 am
Robbie the Pict v Director of Public Prosecutions Queen’s Bench Division “A Gatsometer BV Type 36 traffic light camera was an approved device for recording the position of motor vehicles in relation to light signals. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:28 am
Regina (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another Queen’s Bench Division “An English court would not make a declaration that existing national legislation was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights where there was a ruling by a Scottish court in respect of the same or similar legislation and where the government was in [...] [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:08 am
Earles v Barclays Bank plc Queen’s Bench Division “Although there was no duty on parties to preserve documents before proceedings commenced, after that the situation was radically different. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm
In 321665 Alberta Ltd. v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:15 am
Regina (G) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust; Regina (N) v Secretary of State for Health; Regina (B) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Preventing detained mental patients from smoking was not a breach of article 8, right to respect for private and family life, or article 14, prohibiting discrimination, of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 1:53 am
Director of Public Prosecutions v Wright Regina (Scott) v Taunton Deane Magistrates Court Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The expression ‘hunt’ a wild mammal with a dog in section 1 of the Hunting Act 2004 did not include the activity of searching for a wild animal for the purpose of stalking or flushing it. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:55 am
Regina (Bary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Al Fawwaz) v Same Queen's Bench Divisional Court “There was no common standard for what did or did not amount to inhuman or degrading treatment throughout the many different countries in the world. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:35 am
Regina (V: a Child) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School and Others Queen’s Bench Division “The permanent exclusion of a child from a particular school did not engage the fair trial provisions protected by article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights; the standard of proof in establishing facts was the balance of probabilities. [read post]
