Search for: "Query v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA On 20 December 2020 Congress approved the “second-largest economic relief package in US history” of USD 900bn (the first tracking back to the beginning of the pandemic in March, securing USD 2.2tn). [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:35 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
This week, a federal court in Oregon rebuffed him; the following post summarizes the most recent developments in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 4:57 pm
United States District Judge Richard Leon issued the order in Klayman v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:29 am
" United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 2:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 1:20 pm
Here is the abstract.The 27 words of the Second Amendment formed the basis of the United States Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 9:11 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The United States Supreme Court last week denied certiorari in Stayart v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 2:42 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:57 am
You can find the two court filings below.United States et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Each involves “the targeting of non-United States persons reasonably believed to be located outside the United States to acquire foreign intelligence information. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 2:10 pm
It is cross examination which serves as the quality control unit in these cases. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 6:41 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:41 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:28 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:59 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 5:01 am
In June 2012, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California enjoined Samsung's Galaxy Nexus smartphone because it likely infringed Apple's 8,086,604 patent (the "'604 patent") and because Apple was likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction. [read post]
