Search for: "Quick v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 1:37 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
United States, et. al, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion dismissing plaintiff’s in-sourcing claim. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:45 am
District of Columbia, 2023 WL 5964764 (D.C. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:04 am
Some say just fine, highlighting the language in District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 1:06 pm
District of Columbia for the third time. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
Strike 3 asserts that it has used a combination of forensic and geolocation technology to tie a single IP address, registered to a user in the District of Columbia, to twenty-two acts of infringement on specified dates over the course of a year. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am
The District Court for the District of Columbia recently confirmed that FRE 502(d) orders cannot be used to force a responding party to produce potentially privileged documents without the opportunity to first review them. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am
The District Court for the District of Columbia recently confirmed that FRE 502(d) orders cannot be used to force a responding party to produce potentially privileged documents without the opportunity to first review them. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am
The District Court for the District of Columbia recently confirmed that FRE 502(d) orders cannot be used to force a responding party to produce potentially privileged documents without the opportunity to first review them. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:56 am
The Washington, DC gun control case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 10:04 am
” Amaro v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
Ayers v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 1:59 am
McKee v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
Part-Time Faculty Association v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 7:01 am
Part-Time Faculty Association v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia has also found Mueller’s appointment to be constitutional in the face of a challenge by Concord Management and Consulting, a defendant in the special counsel’s case against the Internet Research Agency. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:00 am
See Rutherford v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
The court cited that 39 of the then 48 states and the District of Columbia in 1913 treated damages recovered for "mental suffering" the same as compensatory damages for a physical injury. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:51 pm
Sebelius to reverse the preliminary injunction against federal funding of embryonic stem cell research granted by Judge Royce Lamberth of the federal District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 8:32 am
Even for those providers that do serve the District of Columbia, AF Holdings’s discovery demands were overbroad because it made no attempt to limit its inquiry to those subscribers who might actually be located in the District. [read post]
