Search for: "Quick v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm by Grant J. Book
United States, et. al, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an opinion dismissing plaintiff’s in-sourcing claim.  [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
Strike 3 asserts that it has used a combination of forensic and geolocation technology to tie a single IP address, registered to a user in the District of Columbia, to twenty-two acts of infringement on specified dates over the course of a year. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am by Caroline E. Oks and Brielle A. Basso
The District Court for the District of Columbia recently confirmed that FRE 502(d) orders cannot be used to force a responding party to produce potentially privileged documents without the opportunity to first review them. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am by Caroline E. Oks and Brielle A. Basso
The District Court for the District of Columbia recently confirmed that FRE 502(d) orders cannot be used to force a responding party to produce potentially privileged documents without the opportunity to first review them. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am by Caroline E. Oks and Brielle A. Basso
The District Court for the District of Columbia recently confirmed that FRE 502(d) orders cannot be used to force a responding party to produce potentially privileged documents without the opportunity to first review them. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 10:56 am by Bruce Thomas
  The Washington, DC gun control case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm by Quinta Jurecic
District Court for the District of Columbia has also found Mueller’s appointment to be constitutional in the face of a challenge by Concord Management and Consulting, a defendant in the special counsel’s case against the Internet Research Agency. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:51 pm by Russell Korobkin
Sebelius to reverse the preliminary injunction against federal funding of embryonic stem cell research granted by Judge Royce Lamberth of the federal District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
The court cited that 39 of the then 48 states and the District of Columbia in 1913 treated damages recovered for "mental suffering" the same as compensatory damages for a physical injury. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Even for those providers that do serve the District of Columbia, AF Holdings’s discovery demands were overbroad because it made no attempt to limit its inquiry to those subscribers who might actually be located in the District. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:52 pm by Edward A. Fallone
District Court for the District of Columbia in  Independence Institute v. [read post]