Search for: "Quill Corp. v. North Dakota" Results 101 - 120 of 120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
North Dakota (504 U.S. 298, 1992), the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Court held in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:37 pm by Christa Culver
Dep’t of Revenue of the State of WashingtonDocket: 10-1289Issue(s): (1) Whether this Court's holding in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
In a report we released last year, we outlined why the reasoning underlying these laws is constitutionally suspect: In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:04 pm
North Dakota (504 U.S. 298). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:49 am by Courtney Minick
It turns out that a 1992 US Supreme Court Case, Quill Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Otherwise, the Court held in its 1992 case Quill Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:47 am by Ken Chan
Congress makes the following findings: (1) States should be encouraged to simplify their sales and use tax systems. (2) As a matter of economic policy and basic fairness, similar sales transactions should be treated equally, without regard to the manner in which sales are transacted, whether in person, through the mail, over the telephone, on the Internet, or by other means. (3) Congress may facilitate such equal taxation consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Quill… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:45 pm by BLOG
However, the United States Supreme Court upheld in its 1992 ruling on Quill Corp v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Though she gives no citation so that one can determine which Supreme Court case she wants to highlight, she surely is referring to Quill Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:22 am
Department of Revenue of Illinois, 386 U.S. 753 (1967), and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:13 pm
North Dakota decision stating that you are largely exempt from collecting a sales tax. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 3:31 pm by Stuart Levine
In the sales tax area, in Quill Corp. v. [read post]