Search for: "Quillen, Appeal of"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2008, 9:10 pm
Beard, and Quillen/Webster in a 22 Sept. 08 post titled: The 'Wearing Down Examiners' Fallacy. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:54 pm
Quillen, Jr. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:10 am
Quillen, Ogden D. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 10:09 am
Quillen and others. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:16 am
There are OpEd from Colorado and Nebraska and a New Mexico editorial.The Denver Post carries Ed Quillen's, "The death penalty's cost. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 11:24 pm
Commentary by Vindu Goel of the San Jose Mercury-News on patent reform was savaged by commenters.Goel parrots Jaffe and Lerner: Unfortunately, the system is broken, threatening the valley's magic formula, which is based on combining old and new ideas into something that no one ever thought of before.Goel parrots Quillen and Webster: inexperienced examiners at the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:06 am
Quillen, Jr. and Ogden H. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Innova/PureWater, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 7:43 am
RGJ 10/25/07 County's Quillen to quit. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 7:21 pm
Quillen and O. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:16 pm
Tafas & GSK Appeal is set for Dec. 5, 2008 but argues that some one at the USPTO or DOJ ought to bag the appeal. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:33 pm
This also sort of reminds one of how some patent reformers cited to Quillen and Webster for a 97% patent grant rate, even though no such thing was in Quillen and Webster. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 7:09 am
Quillen, Jr., and Ogden H. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:13 am
They even show where in the process patents are most likely to be abandoned (hint, after final rejection, not appeal). [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:14 am
Quillen v. [read post]
10 May 2008, 6:06 pm
Quillen and Webster's "97% patent grant rate" number was a scam all along. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 5:42 am
IPBiz notes that there was no appeal. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 2:17 am
The patent law academics bought into the bad analysis, without ever performing a rigorous analysis of what Quillen and Webster were saying.UPDATE. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 1:02 am
Tafas could have drawn a better three judge panel then they did for this appeal of Judge Cacheris' ruling. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 5:14 pm
., the 95% and 97% of Quillen and Webster) are corrected numbers, as is the 75% number of Clarke. [read post]
