Search for: "Quillen v. Quillen"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
In preparing a more detailed paper on errors in Innovation and Its Discontents (Jaffe and Lerner, Princeton University Press, 2004), I revisited the brief of eBay in the eBay v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:38 pm
Separately, Judge Moore discussed a comparison of Quillen/Webster v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 5:45 am
[On a less disguised Lemley flip-flop, recall Lemley switches sides in KSR v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 12:01 pm
A note to Quillen and Webster from the CAFC in KARA TECHNOLOGY v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 7:08 pm
Yet, in KSR v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
Quillen, Jr. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:00 pm
Bandag, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
Quillen, Jr. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 12:58 pm
Yes, Phillips v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:09 pm
The case -- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:39 am
In an article titled PANEL I: KSR V. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 10:37 am
Quillen, Jr. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 7:21 pm
J. 875 (2007), which is generally about KSR v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 8:16 am
If one looks at the second paper of Quillen and Webster (wherein the 97% grant figure is "qualified", 12 Fed. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:13 am
This differs from the methodology of Cotropia, Quillen & Webster, who cannot trace each application, but can merely count them up from reports for a given year.The differences between the studies are not that important for the key measure of that study - how many patent applications are there? [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 6:01 pm
The KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:58 pm
In PSC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:00 pm
" IPBiz notes a similar strategy of proof by sound byte was used in KSR v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:52 am
The brief was filed by Howard Shipley of the Foley firm along with his partner George Quillen. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 11:25 pm
[But of Lemley/Moore and the rules, see Comments on continuation practice proposal appearing in the Federal Register (Jan. 2006) ] See also Law Review on continuation application issue Ta-tah to Quillen/Webster/Lemley? [read post]
