Search for: "Quinn v. State of California" Results 1 - 20 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am by Catherine Fisk
California State Bar, for example, the Court upheld compulsory payment of bar dues by California lawyers. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Late on Wednesday by local (California) time, United States Magistrate Judge Paul S. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:50 am by Florian Mueller
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California).That's why I just can't help but share a soundbite from today's Nokia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am by Ackerman Law Office
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
  In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:12 pm
A Texan by birth/stays a Texan/anywhere on earth. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ California Court of Appeal Holds that Home State "Permission To Sue" Procedures Are Substantive Rules After All In a case of first impression, the California Court of Appeal in Vaughn v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:40 pm by Rosemary Campagna
United States Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:50 am by Amy Howe
  In United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:12 pm
Last July, Judge Linda Quinn granted a motion for class certificationin Wilcox v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Karayanni, Multiculturalism As Covering: On the Accommodation of Minority Religions in Israel, (American Journal of Comparative Law, Forthcoming).Andrea Quinn, After Şahin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]