Search for: "Quinn v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2013, 5:25 am
Labor-Management Organizing Agreements In Unite Here Local 355 v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:20 pm
Labor-Management Organizing Agreements In Unite Here Local 355 v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 12:28 pm by Stefanie Levine
On January 20, 2011 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Centillion Data Systems, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
  In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:15 am by Alex Loomis, Quinta Jurecic
Stay motion Judge Spath moves on to the defense’s “motion to abate pending the resolution of the United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
According to the court’s opinion, this was a result largely dictated by Missouri v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm by Ron Miller
The relationship between the state, the union, and the home health care providers Centeno v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
The decision in McCaughey will not impose a Human Rights Act obligation on the state to investigate pre-commencement deaths, as had been argued in McKerr. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Alisha Kormondy and Jim Shore
Detroit Board of Education, upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring public sector employees covered by a collective bargaining unit to pay agency fees to the union, even when they chose not to be a part of the bargaining unit. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Alisha Kormondy and Jim Shore
Detroit Board of Education, upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring public sector employees covered by a collective bargaining unit to pay agency fees to the union, even when they chose not to be a part of the bargaining unit. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 11:11 am
United States, Justice Scalia, joined by Justice Thomas, persuasively disparaged Holland  (and his critique went unanswered, because the majority opinion decided the case on statutory grounds). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:41 am by Stefanie Levine
Written by Gene Quinn (of IPWatchdog.com and Patent Center Contributor) This morning the United States Patent and Trademark Office published Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:59 am by NCC Staff
On April 18, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in one of the most important cases of the current Supreme Court term: United States v. [read post]