Search for: "R " Results 1 - 20 of 1,074,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2008, 10:44 am
R v Mayers; R v Glasgow; R v Costelloe; R v Bahmanzadeh; R v P and others [2008] EWCA Crim 1418; [2008] WLR (D) 390 “In relation to criminal proceedings there was no power, whether under the Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008 or otherwise, to admit statements of anonymous witnesses made otherwise than in oral [...] [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:44 am
R v Zafar; R v Malik; R v Raja; R v Iqbal; R v Butt [2008] EWCA Crim 184; [2008] WLR (D) 51 “A person possessed an article for terrorist purposes if he possessed it in circumstances which gave rise to a reasonable suspicion that he intended it to be used for the purpose of the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
R v T; R v B; R v C; R v H [2009] EWCA Crim 1035; [2009] WLR (D) 19 “A criminal trial without a jury did not contravene a defendant's right to a fair trial where there was a real danger of jury tampering and proposed measures to prevent such interference did not sufficiently address [...] [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
At around the end of May 2014 , finding that Mr R had not moved out, Mrs R consulted solicitors. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 2:59 am
R v Foster; R v Newman; R v Kempster; R v Birmingham [2007] EWCA Crim 2869 “Where the defendant admitted a lesser or different crime from that charged in the indictment it did not necessarily follow that the trial judge was obliged to leave the alternative verdict for a jury's consideration; sometimes it would be appropriate, but sometimes it would not. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by admin
Spouses and children of the R-1 visa applicant are eligible for an R-2 visa. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In this petition for review the question arose whether the petitioner had indeed raised a R 106 objection. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 2:23 am
R v Abdroikov; R v Green; R v Williamson [2007] UKHL 37 “The principle that justice should not only be done but should be seen to be done and that a defendant had a right to be tried by an independent and impartial tribunal might in certain circumstances be violated when a serving police officer or a lawyer employed by a prosecuting authority was a member of a jury. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 8:54 am
R v Hills; R v Davies; R v Pomfret; [2008] WLR (D) 251 There was no practical reason why an order should not be made requiring an offender to serve an additional period of imprisonment other than the minimum period before being considered for parole where there had been a planned, deliberate and serious act of violence, in circumstances which fully justified a significant sentence of imprisonment. [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:00 am
R v Horncastle and another; R v Marquis and another; R v Carter [2009] EWCA Crim 964; [2009] WLR (D) 173 “There would be no breach of art 6, and in particular art 6(3)(d), of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, if a criminal conviction were based solely or to [...] [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 6:49 am by David Vasella
Juli 2011 das Rundschreiben "Rückstellungen Rückversicherung" veröffentlicht. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:52 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The post Case Previews: R v O’Brien, R (T & Anor) v SSHD & Anor, and R v Mackle (Nos. 1, 2 and 3), and R v McLaughlin appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:52 pm by Bickerton Law
He is scheduled for another federal trial in Chicago later this year.The post R&B star R. [read post]