Search for: "RANDALL v. STANDARD" Results 61 - 80 of 242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
  Rory Little has our preview of Dietz v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 4:34 am by gmlevine
If legality of business were the standard, then “any cybersquatter that conducted a lawful business could always find refuge,” The New England Vein & Laser Center, P.C. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Randall, 912 F.3d 666, 680 (4th Cir. 2019).[6] The Court chose the former, doing so unanimously. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 12:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
State policy required the University to “[v]erify” Oyama’s “ability to function effectively in Department classrooms” before approving his student teaching application. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Sachs, Bill Sjostrom, Marc Steinberg, Ahmed Taha, Steven Thel, Randall Thomas, and Manning Warren.) [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:23 am
Further, the Appellate Division said that Davids had not met his burden of establishing that the demotion was made in bad faith.Although Davids contended that the City failed to follow the procedures for conducting and preparing his performance evaluations, the court decided that this was a “technicality” and the delays complained of by Davids “were undertaken in an attempt to provide [Davids] with time to bring his performance up to department standards and did not… [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958)(striking down requirement of loyalty oath in order to obtain tax benefits)Cooper v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 6:49 am by Florian Mueller
On September 11, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will conduct a hearing on the Apple v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:01 am
However, the court applied the wrong legal standard for determining whether to modify custody. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Callahan, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, July 20, 2018 Tags: Janus Capital v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit May 25 stiffened the standards for alleged patent infringers to assert an inequitable conduct defense ( Therasense Inc. v. [read post]