Search for: "REYNOLDS v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 1,053
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2021, 7:19 pm by Francis Pileggi
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 7:29 pm by Francis Pileggi
It applies Section 327 of the Delaware General Corporation Law using the state supreme court’s ruling in 7547 Partners v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Orin Kerr explained what the Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 2:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Class action tolling was critically important for investors for many reasons, including because most securities class actions do not reach a court decision on class certification until after the repose period has expired (or substantially expired), and the class action tolling doctrine serves one of the class action device’s raisons d’être—concentrating like claims in a single representative proceeding and avoiding splintered litigation and a morass of protective filings.[4]… [read post]
10 May 2021, 12:06 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to modify sentence — Plea agreement On November 12, 1997, pursuant to a binding guilty plea agreement, appellant, Eric Reynolds, pleaded guilty, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, to first-degree murder, attempted first-degree murder, and use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence. [read post]
The Supreme Court rejected his argument and upheld the ban in Reynolds v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 7:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff also wins an equal protection argument because he was treated differently than two other inmates who also committed heinous crimes.The case is Reynolds v. [read post]