Search for: "REYNOLDS v. STATE" Results 481 - 500 of 1,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am by INFORRM
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Bid to Add FOIA Defendants Brings Motion to Amend Complaint Within FRCP 21; Motion Denied Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:26 pm
Reynolds (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 100, 109.)Based on this inadequate record, we cannot address the merits of this claim; therefore, [Appellant] has not carried her burden on appeal. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:33 am by Mila Sohoni
The justices initially wanted Wall to explain how the government could reconcile its position in this case with its earlier position in United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:04 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
  The Court now appears to be holding Reynolds v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 7:19 pm by Francis Pileggi
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:53 pm by David Kopel
The states did not argue that the revisions to the Medicaid grant program violate the 4-factor test in S.D. v. [read post]