Search for: "RIDER v. STATE" Results 161 - 180 of 784
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-1028 Issue: Whether Congress can evade its unambiguous statutory promise to pay health insurers for losses already incurred simply by enacting appropriations riders restricting the sources of funds available to satisfy the government’s obligation. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am by Kia Rahnama
The Supreme Court has already directly borrowed this principle in analyzing the scope of congressional contempt power, stating in Anderson v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 8:45 am
  As President Trump doubles down on dangerous and inflammatory lies about abortion, when abortion access is under attack all over the country, with politicians in state legislatures passing new restrictions designed to make abortion impossible to access or to challenge Roe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
’ …” Lord Kerr SCJ referred to the rider that Sharp J had added to the second criteria in Elliott v Rufus [2015] EWCA Civ 121:- “…To this I would only add that the words ‘should not select one bad meaning where other non-defamatory meanings are available’ are apt to be misleading without fuller explanation. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 3:31 pm by Nathan Sheard
Furthermore, LADOT’s failure to limit law enforcement access to raw trip data through anything less than a warrant signed by a judge is in seeming opposition to the Supreme Court’s holding in Carpenter v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The Appellate Division, Second Department, in its March 6, 2019 decision in Schatz v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
Complications might arise, however,  due to  the  degree of consumer sophistication that courts tend to attribute to internet users, see Public Impact v Boston Consulting. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
 In two recent decisions (“Unwired Planet” and “Conversant”) (Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344, IPKat post here; Huawei v Conversant [2019] EWCA Civ 38, IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal has endorsed this practice.Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm by Grace Gale
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida took this approach in A.L. v. [read post]